Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Matthew Povey's avatar

The NCS certainly was the gold standard. But perhaps it is fools gold. The response rate has fallen from about 75% pre-pandemic to around 42% in 2023. It does not survey those in communal accommodation (the young, and many recent immigrants). By focusing on households (even among which, the response rate has dropped precipitously), it fails to capture many of those that are arguably most likely to be the victims of crime.

There are good reasons to think that Britain is safer today for the average middle class Brit than it was in the past. But that does not mean that it is for everyone. In particular, ironically for recent immigrants. And it is not at all clear that the impact of crime on them (and committed by them on others in the same socio economic groups) are being recorded by the NCS.

Since COVID, screens have remained separating bus drivers from the public. We see reports of increases in attacks on staff in the NHS and rail. Anecdotally at least, those in non-police rule enforcement roles are increasingly reluctant to enforce those rules due to fear of violence on the part of those they are enforced against. It seems hard to claim that everything is getting better when those in such roles feel that it is not.

I wonder if the methods of statistical data gathering that worked in the past are still functioning in the way they should in that they increasingly only capture one part of the picture.

Expand full comment
RJ's avatar

I'm afraid that the "gold-standard Crime Survey" isn't necessarily accurate. It relies on victims making the effort to report their victimhood to the police, and if they don't, perhaps because they have little confidence that police will actually do something - they won't bother. I certainly wouldn't and I was a London cop for many years.

Expand full comment
31 more comments...

No posts